**Important Note: I personally am not concerned with the idea that Mitt Romney is a Mormon as it relates to the presidency. I would not vote against someone simply because of their theological position, unless it has a direct impact on the decisions a president might choose to make (e.g., abortion). Here, I'm merely focused on careful distinctions in theology for individuals.**A great deal of
buzz is going around regarding Mitt Romney's speech about faith and politics. During the speech, Romney seemed intent on clarifying his position on Christ:
“I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind.”
Hey, if you are a Christian, that should do it for you. If you like Romney's platform, and your only concern was his Mormonism, then it's all good now, right?
Well, regardless of his Mormonism, I would challenge you that if anyone says to you that “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind” in order to try to join with you in faith, then a follow up question must be asked: “Who, precisely, is Jesus Christ?”
As Orthodox Christians our answer is that Jesus Christ is God. We believe, teach and confess that He is eternal. He is True God and True Man. We read in Jeremiah 23:6 that His name is YHWH Tsidkenu. As Jesus said in John 8:58, “I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!”
Romney, if he is true to the teachings of Mormonism, would utterly reject the above paragraph. Mormons clearly and explicitly teach that Jesus is the spirit brother of Lucifer and that as Jesus is, you and I can become.
Careful distinctions like this must be made. Consider John's warning in 1 John 2:22-23:
Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist—he denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.
It is again imperative to note that I'm not placing a label on Romney or any other Mormon. Further, the idea of “antichrist” as presented here is merely “one who is against Christ” not some final enemy of the church as portrayed in
some eschatological systems. Instead, I'm suggesting that it is critical for us to have careful distinctions in theology.
Regarding politics, I do not disqualify Romney because of his theology. However, I'm quite intrigued by the
other guy from Hope, Arkansas.